Return to homepage

From the 2020 update report

Executive Summary

In the year since our initial analysis major companies have shifted away from research publishing and towards research assessment; from individual research distribution to consolidated models and the emergence of a “Bigger Deal,” where institutional content licensing is directly linked to the purchase of data analytics services.

1 min read

Last year, SPARC released its Landscape Analysis, an in-depth look at how academic and scholarly publishing are changing and the implications of those changes for the academic community. This was followed by the Roadmap for Action, which was designed to provide higher education leaders suggested actions that institutions might take in order to manage the challenges surfaced in the Landscape Analysis.

What does the landscape look like one year later? This document takes a look at the events of the past year particularly the global COVID health and resulting economic crisis, and provides updates on the academic publishing market landscape, and the status of the key companies involved. It highlights several emerging trends in academic publishing market that merit close attention, including:

  1. A significant deepening in the shift of major companies away from research publishing and towards research assessment;

  2. A shift away from individual research distribution to more communal, consolidated models; and

  3. The emergence of a “Bigger Deal,” where institutional content licensing is directly linked to the purchase of data analytics services.

This update examines the implications of these trends, and provides suggested actions for the community to consider, with a particular emphasis on establishing strong principles to guide the purchase of any data analytics related product or service. It also provides an appendix that reviews in deep detail the financial performance of key academic publishers in 2019 and 2020, as well as their response to changes in their respective marketplaces.

While the current environment presents the significant challenges, it also opens up a strategic opportunity for the academic community to think about a different future, and consider not just focusing on “reopening” using the same system, but to make substantive progress towards building a more equitable and open one.

About the authors

Portrait of Claudio Aspesi

Claudio Aspesi

A respected market analyst with over a decade of experience covering the academic publishing market, and leadership roles at Sanford C. Bernstein, and McKinsey.

Scholarly Publishing and Academic Resources Coalition

SPARC is a non-profit advocacy organization that supports systems for research and education that are open by default and equitable by design.